You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcription profile of soybean-root-knot nematode interaction reveals a key role of phythormones in the resistance reaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-322 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magda Aparecida Beneventi, Orzenil Bonfim da Silva, Maria Eugênia Lisei de Sá, Alexandre Augusto Pereira Firmino, Regina Maria Santos de Amorim, Érika Valéria Saliba Albuquerque, Maria Cristina Mattar da Silva, Joseane Padilha da Silva, Magnólia de Araújo Campos, Marcus José Conceição Lopes, Roberto Coiti Togawa, Georgios Joanis Pappas, Maria Fatima Grossi–de–Sa |
| Abstract |
Root-knot nematodes (RKN- Meloidogyne genus) present extensive challenges to soybean crop. The soybean line (PI 595099) is known to be resistant against specific strains and races of nematode species, thus its differential gene expression analysis can lead to a comprehensive gene expression profiling in the incompatible soybean-RKN interaction. Even though many disease resistance genes have been studied, little has been reported about phytohormone crosstalk on modulation of ROS signaling during soybean-RKN interaction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 26% |
| Researcher | 25 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,611
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,668
of 10,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,685
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#72
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,626 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.