↓ Skip to main content

Trends in incidence and costs of injuries to the shoulder, arm and wrist in The Netherlands between 1986 and 2008

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in incidence and costs of injuries to the shoulder, arm and wrist in The Netherlands between 1986 and 2008
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-531
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne Polinder, Gijs IT Iordens, Martien JM Panneman, Denise Eygendaal, Peter Patka, Dennis Den Hartog, Esther MM Van Lieshout

Abstract

Upper extremity injuries account for a large proportion of attendances to the Emergency Department. The aim of this study was to assess population-based trends in the incidence of upper extremity injuries in the Dutch population between 1986 and 2008, and to give a detailed overview of the associated health care costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,340,012
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,789
of 14,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,357
of 194,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#237
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.