You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genome sequence of the most widely cultivated cacao type and its use to identify candidate genes regulating pod color
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan C Motamayor, Keithanne Mockaitis, Jeremy Schmutz, Niina Haiminen, Donald Livingstone III, Omar Cornejo, Seth D Findley, Ping Zheng, Filippo Utro, Stefan Royaert, Christopher Saski, Jerry Jenkins, Ram Podicheti, Meixia Zhao, Brian E Scheffler, Joseph C Stack, Frank A Feltus, Guiliana M Mustiga, Freddy Amores, Wilbert Phillips, Jean Philippe Marelli, Gregory D May, Howard Shapiro, Jianxin Ma, Carlos D Bustamante, Raymond J Schnell, Dorrie Main, Don Gilbert, Laxmi Parida, David N Kuhn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 17% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 61% |
| Scientists | 14 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 300 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 70 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 166 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#206,317
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#61
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,462
of 226,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.