You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and its short version, the 6-Item CTS symptoms scale: a Rasch analysis one year after surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-020-03626-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juhani Multanen, Jari Ylinen, Teemu Karjalainen, Joona Ikonen, Arja Häkkinen, Jussi P. Repo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,084,501
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,621
of 4,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,285
of 406,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#39
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.