You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the Neandertal legacy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk in Eurasians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Research, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40659-023-00457-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margherita Piccardi, Manuel Gentiluomo, Stefania Bertoncini, Raffaele Pezzilli, Bálint Erőss, Stefania Bunduc, Faik G. Uzunoglu, Renata Talar-Wojnarowska, Tomas Vanagas, Cosimo Sperti, Martin Oliverius, Mateus Nóbrega Aoki, Stefano Ermini, Tamás Hussein, Ugo Boggi, Krzysztof Jamroziak, Evaristo Maiello, Luca Morelli, Ludmila Vodickova, Gregorio Di Franco, Stefano Landi, Andrea Szentesi, Martin Lovecek, Marta Puzzono, Francesca Tavano, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Alessandro Zerbi, Beatrice Mohelnikova-Duchonova, Hannah Stocker, Eithne Costello, Gabriele Capurso, Laura Ginocchi, Rita T. Lawlor, Giuseppe Vanella, Francesca Bazzocchi, Jakob R. Izbicki, Anna Latiano, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Ruggero Ponz de Leon Pisani, Ben Schöttker, Pavel Soucek, Péter Hegyi, Maria Gazouli, Thilo Hackert, Juozas Kupcinskas, Lina Poskiene, Matteo Tacelli, Susanne Roth, Silvia Carrara, Francesco Perri, Viktor Hlavac, George E. Theodoropoulos, Olivier R. Busch, Andrea Mambrini, Casper H. J. van Eijck, Paolo Arcidiacono, Aldo Scarpa, Claudio Pasquali, Daniela Basso, Maurizio Lucchesi, Anna Caterina Milanetto, John P. Neoptolemos, Giulia Martina Cavestro, Dainius Janciauskas, Xuechen Chen, Roger Chammas, Mara Goetz, Hermann Brenner, Livia Archibugi, Michael Dannemann, Federico Canzian, Sergio Tofanelli, Daniele Campa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#16,737,737
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biological Research
#288
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,386
of 355,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Research
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.