You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomaterials Research, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40824-016-0063-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seung Moon Lee, Il Kyu Park, Yong Soo Kim, Hyun Jung Kim, Hanlim Moon, Stefan Mueller, Young-IL Jeong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 23 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 14 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 76 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials Research
#32
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,958
of 354,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials Research
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.