↓ Skip to main content

What are the benefits of early patient contact? - A comparison of three preclinical patient contact settings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are the benefits of early patient contact? - A comparison of three preclinical patient contact settings
Published in
BMC Medical Education, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjorie D Wenrich, Molly B Jackson, Ineke Wolfhagen, Paul G Ramsey, Albert JJ Scherpbier

Abstract

Despite increasing attention to providing preclinical medical students with early patient experiences, little is known about associated outcomes for students. The authors compared three early patient experiences at a large American medical school where all preclinical students complete preceptorships and weekly bedside clinical-skills training and about half complete clinical, community-based summer immersion experiences. The authors asked, what are the relative outcomes and important educational components for students?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Lecturer 7 7%
Other 31 29%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,933,444
of 23,464,797 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#265
of 3,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,920
of 197,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,464,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.