↓ Skip to main content

Nerve excitation using an amplitude-modulated signal with kilohertz-frequency carrier and non-zero offset

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nerve excitation using an amplitude-modulated signal with kilohertz-frequency carrier and non-zero offset
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12984-016-0171-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonel E. Medina, Warren M. Grill

Abstract

Incorporating kilohertz-frequency signals in transcutaneous electrical stimulation has been proposed as a means to overcome the impedance of the skin, thereby reaching deeper nerves. In particular, a transdermal amplitude modulated signal (TAMS), composed of a 210 kHz non-zero offset carrier modulated by rectangular pulses, was introduced recently for the treatment of overactive bladder. However, the contribution of the components of TAMS to nerve fiber activation has not been quantified. We conducted in vivo experiments and applied direct stimulation to the sciatic nerve of cats and rats. We measured electromyogram and compound action potential activity evoked by pulses, TAMS and modified versions of TAMS in which we varied the size of the carrier. Nerve fiber activation using TAMS showed no difference with respect to activation with conventional pulse for carrier frequencies of 20 kHz and higher, regardless the relative amplitude of the carrier. For frequencies lower than 20 kHz, the offset needed to generate half of the maximal evoked response decreased significantly with respect to the pulse. Results of simulations in a computational model of nerve fiber stimulation using the same stimulation waveforms closely matched our experimental measurements. Taken together, these results suggest that a TAMS with carrier frequencies >20 kHz does not offer any advantage over conventional pulses, even with larger amplitudes of the carrier, and this has implications for design of waveforms for efficient and effective transcutaneous stimulation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 36%
Neuroscience 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,636,252
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#507
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,650
of 355,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.