You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2199-7-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Schroeder, Odilo Mueller, Susanne Stocker, Ruediger Salowsky, Michael Leiber, Marcus Gassmann, Samar Lightfoot, Wolfram Menzel, Martin Granzow, Thomas Ragg |
| Abstract |
The integrity of RNA molecules is of paramount importance for experiments that try to reflect the snapshot of gene expression at the moment of RNA extraction. Until recently, there has been no reliable standard for estimating the integrity of RNA samples and the ratio of 28S:18S ribosomal RNA, the common measure for this purpose, has been shown to be inconsistent. The advent of microcapillary electrophoretic RNA separation provides the basis for an automated high-throughput approach, in order to estimate the integrity of RNA samples in an unambiguous way. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 63% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 88% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | <1% |
| Germany | 13 | <1% |
| Spain | 9 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 37 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2285 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 559 | 23% |
| Researcher | 409 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 315 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 255 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 148 | 6% |
| Other | 312 | 13% |
| Unknown | 410 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 888 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 522 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 203 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 65 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 47 | 2% |
| Other | 216 | 9% |
| Unknown | 467 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,279,439
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#10
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,125
of 173,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.