You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A multi-level system quality improvement intervention to reduce racial disparities in hypertension care and control: study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-60 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa A Cooper, Jill A Marsteller, Gary J Noronha, Sarah J Flynn, Kathryn A Carson, Romsai T Boonyasai, Cheryl A Anderson, Hanan J Aboumatar, Debra L Roter, Katherine B Dietz, Edgar R Miller, Gregory P Prokopowicz, Arlene T Dalcin, Jeanne B Charleston, Michelle Simmons, Mary Margaret Huizinga |
| Abstract |
Racial disparities in blood pressure control have been well documented in the United States. Research suggests that many factors contribute to this disparity, including barriers to care at patient, clinician, healthcare system, and community levels. To date, few interventions aimed at reducing hypertension disparities have addressed factors at all of these levels. This paper describes the design of Project ReD CHiP (Reducing Disparities and Controlling Hypertension in Primary Care), a multi-level system quality improvement project. By intervening on multiple levels, this project aims to reduce disparities in blood pressure control and improve guideline concordant hypertension care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,372,167
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,234
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,500
of 197,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.