↓ Skip to main content

Core components for effective infection prevention and control programmes: new WHO evidence-based recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,390)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
66 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
319 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
755 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Core components for effective infection prevention and control programmes: new WHO evidence-based recommendations
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13756-016-0149-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Storr, Anthony Twyman, Walter Zingg, Nizam Damani, Claire Kilpatrick, Jacqui Reilly, Lesley Price, Matthias Egger, M. Lindsay Grayson, Edward Kelley, Benedetta Allegranzi, the WHO Guidelines Development Group

Abstract

Health care-associated infections (HAI) are a major public health problem with a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and quality of life. They represent also an important economic burden to health systems worldwide. However, a large proportion of HAI are preventable through effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. Improvements in IPC at the national and facility level are critical for the successful containment of antimicrobial resistance and the prevention of HAI, including outbreaks of highly transmissible diseases through high quality care within the context of universal health coverage. Given the limited availability of IPC evidence-based guidance and standards, the World Health Organization (WHO) decided to prioritize the development of global recommendations on the core components of effective IPC programmes both at the national and acute health care facility level, based on systematic literature reviews and expert consensus. The aim of the guideline development process was to identify the evidence and evaluate its quality, consider patient values and preferences, resource implications, and the feasibility and acceptability of the recommendations. As a result, 11 recommendations and three good practice statements are presented here, including a summary of the supporting evidence, and form the substance of a new WHO IPC guideline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 755 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 755 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 113 15%
Researcher 73 10%
Student > Bachelor 69 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 7%
Student > Postgraduate 45 6%
Other 125 17%
Unknown 275 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 125 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 3%
Social Sciences 21 3%
Other 109 14%
Unknown 301 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#657,481
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#50
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,632
of 430,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.