↓ Skip to main content

Is allergic sensitization relevant in severe asthma? Which allergens may be culprits?

Overview of attention for article published in World Allergy Organization Journal, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is allergic sensitization relevant in severe asthma? Which allergens may be culprits?
Published in
World Allergy Organization Journal, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40413-016-0138-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Lombardi, Eleonora Savi, Erminia Ridolo, Giovanni Passalacqua, Giorgio Walter Canonica

Abstract

Severe asthma is a major health concern. The allergic (IgE-mediated) form of asthma is well known from a pathogenic viewpoint. We searched the available literature to identify which allergens are most frequently associated with severe, refractory or life threatening asthma. According to the results, molds, pet dander, cockroach and ragweed were more frequently responsible for severe asthma. Thunderstorm asthma, in addition, represents a special association between allergic sensitization and an external climatic factor. A detailed knowledge of the most harmful allergens is mandatory for an appropriate diagnostic and preventive approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,809,998
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#71
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,196
of 421,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.