You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing structural modeling for a specific protein scaffold: knottins or inhibitor cystine knots
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-11-535 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jérôme Gracy, Laurent Chiche |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,135,862
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,135
of 7,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,409
of 103,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#21
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.