↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive training plus a comprehensive psychosocial programme (OPUS) versus the comprehensive psychosocial programme alone for patients with first-episode schizophrenia (the NEUROCOM trial): A study…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive training plus a comprehensive psychosocial programme (OPUS) versus the comprehensive psychosocial programme alone for patients with first-episode schizophrenia (the NEUROCOM trial): A study protocol for a centrally randomised, observer-blinded multi-centre clinical trial
Published in
Trials, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lone Vesterager, Torben Ø Christensen, Birthe B Olsen, Gertrud Krarup, Hysse B Forchhammer, Marianne Melau, Christian Gluud, Merete Nordentoft

Abstract

Up to 85% of patients with schizophrenia demonstrate cognitive dysfunction in at least one domain. Cognitive dysfunction plays a major role in functional outcome. It is hypothesized that addition of cognitive training to a comprehensive psychosocial programme (OPUS) enhances both cognitive and everyday functional capacity of patients more than the comprehensive psychosocial programme alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 51 28%