↓ Skip to main content

Induction of selective cytotoxicity and apoptosis in human T4-lymphoblastoid cell line (CEMss) by boesenbergin a isolated from boesenbergia rotunda rhizomes involves mitochondrial pathway, activation…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Induction of selective cytotoxicity and apoptosis in human T4-lymphoblastoid cell line (CEMss) by boesenbergin a isolated from boesenbergia rotunda rhizomes involves mitochondrial pathway, activation of caspase 3 and G2/M phase cell cycle arrest
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuan-Beng Ng, Ahmad Bustamam, Mohd Aspollah Sukari, Siddig Ibrahim Abdelwahab, Syam Mohan, Michael James Christopher Buckle, Behnam Kamalidehghan, Nabilah Muhammad Nadzri, Theebaa Anasamy, A Hamid A Hadi, Heshu Sulaiman Rahman

Abstract

Boesenbergia rotunda (Roxb.) Schlecht (family zingiberaceae) is a rhizomatous herb that is distributed from north-eastern India to south-east Asia, especially in Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia. Previous research has shown that the crude extract of this plant has cytotoxic properties. The current study examines the cytotoxic properties of boesenbergin A isolated from Boesenbergia rotunda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 3%
Indonesia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Chemistry 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,340,012
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,498
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,791
of 192,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#55
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.