↓ Skip to main content

Defining and measuring gender: A social determinant of health whose time has come

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defining and measuring gender: A social determinant of health whose time has come
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, July 2005
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-4-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan P Phillips

Abstract

This paper contributes to a nascent scholarly discussion of sex and gender as determinants of health. Health is a composite of biological makeup and socioeconomic circumstances. Differences in health and illness patterns of men and women are attributable both to sex, or biology, and to gender, that is, social factors such as powerlessness, access to resources, and constrained roles. Using examples such as the greater life expectancy of women in most of the world, despite their relative social disadvantage, and the disproportionate risk of myocardial infarction amongst men, but death from MI amongst women, the independent and combined associations of sex and gender on health are explored. A model for incorporating gender into epidemiologic analyses is proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 342 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Researcher 35 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 114 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 64 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 9%
Psychology 23 7%
Arts and Humanities 14 4%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 124 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,146,789
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#144
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,472
of 70,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.