↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of congregation- versus clinic-based approach to prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of congregation- versus clinic-based approach to prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
Published in
Implementation Science, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Echezona E Ezeanolue, Michael C Obiefune, Wei Yang, Stephen K Obaro, Chinenye O Ezeanolue, Gbenga G Ogedegbe

Abstract

A total of 22 priority countries have been identified by the WHO that account for 90% of pregnant women living with HIV. Nigeria is one of only 4 countries among the 22 with an HIV testing rate for pregnant women of less than 20%. Currently, most pregnant women must access a healthcare facility (HF) to be screened and receive available prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) interventions. Finding new approaches to increase HIV testing among pregnant women is necessary to realize the WHO/ President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) goal of eliminating new pediatric infections by 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 301 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 19%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 82 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 17%
Social Sciences 30 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 96 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,119,153
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,190
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,530
of 197,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#23
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.