You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematically reviewing and synthesizing evidence from conversation analytic and related discursive research to inform healthcare communication practice and policy: an illustrated guide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-69 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth H Parry, Victoria Land |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Linguistics | 16 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,266,714
of 25,035,235 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#324
of 2,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,640
of 200,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,035,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.