You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Commercial Determinants of Health and Evidence Synthesis (CODES): methodological guidance for systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-023-02323-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Petticrew, Rebecca E. Glover, Jimmy Volmink, Laurence Blanchard, Éadaoin Cott, Cécile Knai, Nason Maani, James Thomas, Alice Tompson, May C. I. van Schalkwyk, Vivian Welch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 40 | 34% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Ireland | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Oman | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 51% |
| Scientists | 32 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#655,896
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#73
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,907
of 357,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.