You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Subclinical cardiac dysfunction may impact on fluid and vasopressor administration during early resuscitation of septic shock
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s44158-023-00117-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francesco Murgolo, Rossella di Mussi, Antonio Messina, Luigi Pisani, Lidia Dalfino, Antonio Civita, Monica Stufano, Altamura Gianluca, Francesco Staffieri, Nicola Bartolomeo, Savino Spadaro, Nicola Brienza, Salvatore Grasso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 33% |
Italy | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,135,104
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#103
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,625
of 356,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.