The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-022-01696-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Richard McNulty |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 22% |
Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#18,066,451
of 26,433,695 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,757
of 2,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,824
of 441,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#35
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,433,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.