↓ Skip to main content

A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01696-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard McNulty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 5 29%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,685,268
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,628
of 2,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,771
of 425,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#32
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.