↓ Skip to main content

Applying openEHR’s Guideline Definition Language to the SITS international stroke treatment registry: a European retrospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying openEHR’s Guideline Definition Language to the SITS international stroke treatment registry: a European retrospective observational study
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12911-016-0401-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadim Anani, Michael V. Mazya, Rong Chen, Tiago Prazeres Moreira, Olivier Bill, Niaz Ahmed, Nils Wahlgren, Sabine Koch

Abstract

Interoperability standards intend to standardise health information, clinical practice guidelines intend to standardise care procedures, and patient data registries are vital for monitoring quality of care and for clinical research. This study combines all three: it uses interoperability specifications to model guideline knowledge and applies the result to registry data. We applied the openEHR Guideline Definition Language (GDL) to data from 18,400 European patients in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) registry to retrospectively check their compliance with European recommendations for acute stroke treatment. Comparing compliance rates obtained with GDL to those obtained by conventional statistical data analysis yielded a complete match, suggesting that GDL technology is reliable for guideline compliance checking. The successful application of a standard guideline formalism to a large patient registry dataset is an important step toward widespread implementation of computer-interpretable guidelines in clinical practice and registry-based research. Application of the methodology gave important results on the evolution of stroke care in Europe, important both for quality of care monitoring and clinical research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 24 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Computer Science 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 26 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,503,568
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#771
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,724
of 421,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.