↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of a tele-retinopathy-based intervention to encourage greater attendance to diabetic retinopathy screening in immigrants living with diabetes…

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of a tele-retinopathy-based intervention to encourage greater attendance to diabetic retinopathy screening in immigrants living with diabetes from China and African-Caribbean countries in Ottawa, Canada: a protocol
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, September 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40814-023-01372-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Umaefulam, Mackenzie Wilson, Marie Carole Boucher, Michael H. Brent, Maman Joyce Dogba, Olivia Drescher, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Noah M. Ivers, John G. Lawrenson, Fabiana Lorencatto, David Maberley, Nicola McCleary, Sheena McHugh, Olivera Sutakovic, Kednapa Thavorn, Holly O. Witteman, Catherine Yu, Hao Cheng, Wei Han, Yu Hong, Balkissa Idrissa, Tina Leech, Joffré Malette, Isabelle Mongeon, Zawadi Mugisho, Marlyse Mbakop Nguebou, Sara Pabla, Siffan Rahman, Azaratou Samandoulougou, Hasina Visram, Richard You, Junqiang Zhao, Justin Presseau

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#22,012,573
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#1,104
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,401
of 250,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#28
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.