↓ Skip to main content

Attention-based dual-path feature fusion network for automatic skin lesion segmentation

Overview of attention for article published in BioData Mining, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attention-based dual-path feature fusion network for automatic skin lesion segmentation
Published in
BioData Mining, October 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13040-023-00345-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenxiang He, Xiaoxia Li, Yuling Chen, Nianzu Lv, Yong Cai

Abstract

Automatic segmentation of skin lesions is a critical step in Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) of melanoma. However, due to the blurring of the lesion boundary, uneven color distribution, and low image contrast, resulting in poor segmentation result. Aiming at the problem of difficult segmentation of skin lesions, this paper proposes an Attention-based Dual-path Feature Fusion Network (ADFFNet) for automatic skin lesion segmentation. Firstly, in the spatial path, a Boundary Refinement (BR) module is designed for the output of low-level features to filter out irrelevant background information and retain more boundary details of the lesion area. Secondly, in the context path, a Multi-scale Feature Selection (MFS) module is constructed for high-level feature output to capture multi-scale context information and use the attention mechanism to filter out redundant semantic information. Finally, we design a Dual-path Feature Fusion (DFF) module, which uses high-level global attention information to guide the step-by-step fusion of high-level semantic features and low-level detail features, which is beneficial to restore image detail information and further improve the pixel-level segmentation accuracy of skin lesion. In the experiment, the ISIC 2018 and PH2 datasets are employed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. It achieves a performance of 0.890/ 0.925 and 0.933 /0.954 on the F1-score and SE index, respectively. Comparative analysis with state-of-the-art segmentation methods reveals that the ADFFNet algorithm exhibits superior segmentation performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#22,040,048
of 24,589,002 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#299
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,810
of 169,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,589,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.