↓ Skip to main content

Malabsorption and nutritional balance in the ICU: fecal weight as a biomarker: a prospective observational pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malabsorption and nutritional balance in the ICU: fecal weight as a biomarker: a prospective observational pilot study
Published in
Critical Care, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10530
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolette J Wierdsma, Job HC Peters, Peter JM Weijs, Martjin B Keur, Armand RJ Girbes, Ad A van Bodegraven, Albertus Beishuizen

Abstract

Malabsorption, which is frequently underdiagnosed in critically ill patients, is clinically relevant with regard to nutritional balance and nutritional management. We aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of fecal weight as a biomarker for fecal loss and additionally to assess fecal macronutrient contents and intestinal absorption capacity in ICU patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 4%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 17%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 22 29%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Engineering 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#6,383
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,594
of 155,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.