You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variation of cataract surgery costs in four different graded providers of China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-543 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiahua Fang, Xinghua Wang, Zhende Lin, Jihua Yan, Ye Yang, Jingbo Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,272,767
of 24,620,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,829
of 16,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,569
of 99,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.