You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A cross-sectional observational study of unmet health needs among homeless and vulnerably housed adults in three Canadian cities
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-577 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Niran Argintaru, Catharine Chambers, Evie Gogosis, Susan Farrell, Anita Palepu, Fran Klodawsky, Stephen W Hwang |
Abstract |
Homeless persons experience a high burden of health problems; yet, they face significant barriers in accessing health care. Less is known about unmet needs for care among vulnerably housed persons who live in poor-quality or temporary housing and are at high risk of becoming homeless. The objectives of this study were to examine the prevalence of and factors associated with unmet needs for health care in a population-based sample of homeless and vulnerably housed adults in three major cities within a universal health insurance system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 50% |
United States | 3 | 38% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 173 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
Researcher | 16 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 45 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 14% |
Psychology | 10 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 10% |
Unknown | 54 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2013.
All research outputs
#5,556,876
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,481
of 14,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,675
of 196,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#94
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.