You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Introducing integrated laboratory classes in a PBL curriculum: impact on student’s learning and satisfaction
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-71 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Samy A Azer, Rana Hasanato, Sami Al-Nassar, Ali Somily, Muslim M AlSaadi |
Abstract |
With the introduction of integrated problem-based learning (PBL) program in the medical curriculum, there is a need to create laboratory classes that suit students' learning needs and the changes introduced to the curriculum. This paper outlines the development and implementation of four integrated laboratory classes (ILCs) at King Saud University College of Medicine. It also examines whether core concepts addressed in these classes were learned and retained and how the students perceived the ILCs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
Thailand | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 14 | 14% |
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Researcher | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 29% |
Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 22% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,812,604
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,834
of 3,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,899
of 196,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#36
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.