You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A flow visualization model of duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy with gastric interposition
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-8-192 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chul-Hyun Park, Jae-Ik Lee, Jaeyong Sung, Sunghoon Choi, Kwang-Pil Ko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,651,408
of 24,673,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#63
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,488
of 209,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,673,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.