You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An animal-free preclinical drug screening platform based on human precision-cut kidney slices
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13104-023-06303-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henricus A. M. Mutsaers, Michael Schou Jensen, Jean-Claude Kresse, Stine Julie Tingskov, Mia Gebauer Madsen, Rikke Nørregaard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,237,225
of 24,676,547 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,347
of 4,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,125
of 406,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,676,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.