↓ Skip to main content

Automated assay for screening the enzymatic release of reducing sugars from micronized biomass

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 1,599)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated assay for screening the enzymatic release of reducing sugars from micronized biomass
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2859-9-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Navarro, Marie Couturier, Gabriela Ghizzi Damasceno da Silva, Jean-Guy Berrin, Xavier Rouau, Marcel Asther, Christophe Bignon

Abstract

To reduce the production cost of bioethanol obtained from fermentation of the sugars provided by degradation of lignocellulosic biomass (i.e., second generation bioethanol), it is necessary to screen for new enzymes endowed with more efficient biomass degrading properties. This demands the set-up of high-throughput screening methods. Several methods have been devised all using microplates in the industrial SBS format. Although this size reduction and standardization has greatly improved the screening process, the published methods comprise one or more manual steps that seriously decrease throughput. Therefore, we worked to devise a screening method devoid of any manual steps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 130 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 12%
Chemistry 7 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 16 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,823,115
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#45
of 1,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,490
of 95,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,599 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them