You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-023-00263-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krystle Campbell, Aimee Gardner, Daniel J. Scott, Jada Johnson, Jillian Harvey, Abby Kazley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 19% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,411,160
of 25,128,618 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#227
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,353
of 344,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,128,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.