You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathaniel P Katz, Florence C Paillard, Evan Ekman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 26% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 13% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 52 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,748,456
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#280
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,038
of 360,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.