You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions using toothpaste containing tricalcium phosphate and fluoride: an in vitro µCT analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12903-020-01286-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hidenori Hamba, Keiki Nakamura, Toru Nikaido, Junji Tagami, Takashi Muramatsu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,248,224
of 24,704,144 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#494
of 1,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,898
of 426,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,704,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.