You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cefoxitin versus carbapenems as definitive treatment for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in intensive care unit: a propensity-matched retrospective analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-023-04712-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanguy Dequidt, Sylvaine Bastian, Mathieu Nacher, Sébastien Breurec, Michel Carles, Guillaume Thiery, Laurent Camous, Benoit Tressieres, Marc Valette, Jean-David Pommier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 13% |
| Colombia | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 12% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#739,820
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#512
of 6,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,024
of 365,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#15
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.