You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiac tissue engineering: state-of-the-art methods and outlook
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biological Engineering, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13036-019-0185-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anh H. Nguyen, Paul Marsh, Lauren Schmiess-Heine, Peter J. Burke, Abraham Lee, Juhyun Lee, Hung Cao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 305 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 120 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 54 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 19 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 122 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,281,150
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#51
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,283
of 356,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.