↓ Skip to main content

What explains between-school differences in rates of sexual experience?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What explains between-school differences in rates of sexual experience?
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-8-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion Henderson, Isabella Butcher, Daniel Wight, Lisa Williamson, Gillian Raab

Abstract

Schools have the potential to influence their pupils' behaviour through the school's social organisation and culture, as well as through the formal curriculum. This paper provides the first attempt to explain the differences between schools in rates of reported heterosexual sexual experience amongst 15 and 16 year olds. It first examined whether variations in rates of sexual experience remained after controlling for the known predictors of sexual activity. It then examined whether these residuals, or 'school effects', were attributable to processes within the school, or were more likely to reflect characteristics of the neighbourhood.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Lecturer 4 8%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Psychology 7 15%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,925,861
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,392
of 14,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,542
of 156,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.