You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-68 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laure Perrier, Nav Persaud, Anita Ko, Monika Kastner, Jeremy Grimshaw, K Ann McKibbon, Sharon E Straus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
Australia | 2 | 13% |
Canada | 2 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
Scientists | 4 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Librarian | 4 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 25% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2013.
All research outputs
#3,352,517
of 25,214,112 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#691
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,564
of 204,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,214,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.