↓ Skip to main content

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12872-016-0425-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas M. Berbenetz, Marko Mrkobrada

Abstract

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been associated with improved patient outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but not preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of selective and nonselective MRAs in HFrEF and HFpEF. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MRAs in adults with HFpEF or HFrEF if they reported data on major adverse cardiac events or drug safety. We identified 15 studies representing 16321 patients. MRAs were associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.81 [0.75-0.87], I(2) 0%), all-cause mortality (RR 0.83 [0.77-0.88], I(2) 0%), and cardiac hospitalizations (RR 0.80 [0.70-0.92], I(2) 58.4%). However, an a-priori specified subgroup analysis demonstrated that these benefits were limited to HFrEF (cardiovascular death RR 0.79 [0.73-0.86], I(2) 0%; all-cause mortality RR 0.81 [0.75-0.87], I(2) 0%; cardiac hospitalizations RR 0.76 [0.64-0.90], I(2) 68%), but not HFpEF (all-cause mortality RR 0.92 [0.79-1.08], I(2) 0%; cardiac hospitalizations RR 0.91 [0.67-1.24], I(2) 17%). MRAs increased the risk of hyperkalemia (RR 2.03 [1.78-2.31], I(2) 0%). Nonselective MRAs, but not selective MRAs increased the risk of gynecomastia (RR 7.37 [4.42-12.30], I(2) 0% vs. RR 0.74 [0.43-1.27], I(2) 0%). Evidence was of moderate quality for cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations; and high-quality for hyperkalemia and gynecomastia. MRAs reduce the risk of adverse cardiac events in HFrEF but not HFpEF. MRA use in HFpEF increases the risk of harm from hyperkalemia and gynecomastia. Selective MRAs are equally effective as nonselective MRAs, without a risk of gynecomastia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,292,187
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#554
of 1,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,341
of 416,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,625 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.