You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complementary biobank of rodent tissue samples to study the effect of World Trade Center exposure on cancer development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-019-2089-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wil Lieberman-Cribbin, Stephanie Tuminello, Christina Gillezeau, Maaike van Gerwen, Rachel Brody, David J. Mulholland, Lori Horton, Maureen Sisco, Colette Prophete, Judith Zelikoff, Hyun-Wook Lee, Sung-Hyun Park, Lung-Chi Chen, Mitchell D. Cohen, Emanuela Taioli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
| Psychology | 1 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,262,076
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,435
of 4,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,032
of 359,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#22
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.