↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of prevalence and exposure-disease associations using self-report and hospitalization data among enrollees of the world trade center health registry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of prevalence and exposure-disease associations using self-report and hospitalization data among enrollees of the world trade center health registry
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01358-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Howard E. Alper, Jennifer Brite, James E. Cone, Robert M. Brackbill

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,262,076
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,203
of 2,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,509
of 423,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#32
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.