You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing a practice guideline for the occupational health services by using a community of practice approach: a process evaluation of the development process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-016-4010-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lydia Kwak, Charlotte Wåhlin, Kjerstin Stigmar, Irene Jensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 24% |
| Unknown | 38 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,787,819
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,428
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,146
of 428,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#53
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.