You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
User guide for mapping-by-sequencing in Arabidopsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geo Velikkakam James, Vipul Patel, Karl JV Nordström, Jonas R Klasen, Patrice A Salomé, Detlef Weigel, Korbinian Schneeberger |
| Abstract |
Mapping-by-sequencing combines genetic mapping with whole-genome sequencing in order to accelerate mutant identification. However, application of mapping-by-sequencing requires decisions on various practical settings on the experimental design that are not intuitively answered. Following an experimentally determined recombination landscape of Arabidopsis and next generation sequencing-specific biases, we simulated more than 400,000 mapping-by-sequencing experiments. This allowed us to evaluate a broad range of different types of experiments and to develop general rules for mapping-by-sequencing in Arabidopsis. Most importantly, this informs about the properties of different crossing scenarios, the number of recombinants and sequencing depth needed for successful mapping experiments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| Germany | 4 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| China | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 439 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 122 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 7% |
| Professor | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 296 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 93 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,794,668
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,163
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,477
of 209,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#33
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.