You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hemostatic bioactivity of novel Pollen Typhae Carbonisata-derived carbon quantum dots
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-017-0296-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Yan, Yan Zhao, Juan Luo, Wei Xiong, Xiaoman Liu, Jinjun Cheng, Yongzhi Wang, Meiling Zhang, Huihua Qu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,677,635
of 24,776,799 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#162
of 1,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,190
of 320,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,776,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.