You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prediction of linear B-cell epitopes of hepatitis C virus for vaccine development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Genomics, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1755-8794-8-s4-s3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wen-Lin Huang, Ming-Ju Tsai, Kai-Ti Hsu, Jyun-Rong Wang, Yi-Hsiung Chen, Shinn-Ying Ho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,280,234
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#393
of 1,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,838
of 399,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.