↓ Skip to main content

Conceptual framework of public health surveillance and action and its application in health sector reform

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conceptual framework of public health surveillance and action and its application in health sector reform
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-2-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott JN McNabb, Stella Chungong, Mike Ryan, Tadesse Wuhib, Peter Nsubuga, Wondi Alemu, Vilma Carande-Kulis, Guenael Rodier

Abstract

Because both public health surveillance and action are crucial, the authors initiated meetings at regional and national levels to assess and reform surveillance and action systems. These meetings emphasized improved epidemic preparedness, epidemic response, and highlighted standardized assessment and reform. To standardize assessments, the authors designed a conceptual framework for surveillance and action that categorized the framework into eight core and four support activities, measured with indicators. In application, country-level reformers measure both the presence and performance of the six core activities comprising public health surveillance (detection, registration, reporting, confirmation, analyses, and feedback) and acute (epidemic-type) and planned (management-type) responses composing the two core activities of public health action. Four support activities - communications, supervision, training, and resource provision - enable these eight core processes. National, multiple systems can then be concurrently assessed at each level for effectiveness, technical efficiency, and cost. This approach permits a cost analysis, highlights areas amenable to integration, and provides focused intervention. The final public health model becomes a district-focused, action-oriented integration of core and support activities with enhanced effectiveness, technical efficiency, and cost savings. This reform approach leads to sustained capacity development by an empowerment strategy defined as facilitated, process-oriented action steps transforming staff and the system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 250 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 22%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Lecturer 15 6%
Other 59 23%
Unknown 57 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 14%
Social Sciences 28 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 64 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,187,132
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,555
of 15,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,068
of 126,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them