↓ Skip to main content

A diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for spinal pain part 2: review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for spinal pain part 2: review of the literature
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, August 2008
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-16-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald R Murphy, Eric L Hurwitz, Craig F Nelson

Abstract

Spinal pain is a common and often disabling problem. The research on various treatments for spinal pain has, for the most part, suggested that while several interventions have demonstrated mild to moderate short-term benefit, no single treatment has a major impact on either pain or disability. There is great need for more accurate diagnosis in patients with spinal pain. In a previous paper, the theoretical model of a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule was presented. The approach is designed to provide the clinician with a strategy for arriving at a specific working diagnosis from which treatment decisions can be made. It is based on three questions of diagnosis. In the current paper, the literature on the reliability and validity of the assessment procedures that are included in the diagnosis-based clinical decision rule is presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 82 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Lecturer 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 31 35%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 19 21%