↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided Internet- and mobile-based intervention for the indicated prevention of major depression in patients with chronic back pain—study protocol of the PROD-B…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
495 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided Internet- and mobile-based intervention for the indicated prevention of major depression in patients with chronic back pain—study protocol of the PROD-BP multicenter pragmatic RCT
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12888-017-1193-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Sander, S. Paganini, J. Lin, S. Schlicker, D. D. Ebert, C. Buntrock, H. Baumeister

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 490 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 13%
Student > Bachelor 57 12%
Researcher 49 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 6%
Other 76 15%
Unknown 146 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 136 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 10%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 54 11%
Unknown 174 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,120,836
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,256
of 5,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,133
of 425,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#59
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.