↓ Skip to main content

Microbes, the gut and ankylosing spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbes, the gut and ankylosing spondylitis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/ar4228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary-Ellen Costello, Dirk Elewaut, Tony J Kenna, Matthew A Brown

Abstract

It is increasingly clear that the interaction between host and microbiome profoundly affects health. There are 10 times more bacteria in and on our bodies than the total of our own cells, and the human intestine contains approximately 100 trillion bacteria. Interrogation of microbial communities by using classic microbiology techniques offers a very restricted view of these communities, allowing us to see only what we can grow in isolation. However, recent advances in sequencing technologies have greatly facilitated systematic and comprehensive studies of the role of the microbiome in human health and disease. Comprehensive understanding of our microbiome will enhance understanding of disease pathogenesis, which in turn may lead to rationally targeted therapy for a number of conditions, including autoimmunity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Other 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,929,324
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,591
of 3,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,042
of 211,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.