You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the feasibility of using long-term stored newborn dried blood spots to identify metabolic features for congenital heart disease screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomarker Research, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40364-023-00536-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott R. Ceresnak, Yaqi Zhang, Xuefeng B. Ling, Kuo Jung Su, Qiming Tang, Bo Jin, James Schilling, C. James Chou, Zhi Han, Brendan J. Floyd, John C. Whitin, Kuo Yuan Hwa, Karl G Sylvester, Henry Chubb, Ruben Y. Luo, Lu Tian, Harvey J. Cohen, Doff B. McElhinney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,911,423
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Biomarker Research
#203
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,194
of 354,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomarker Research
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.